Showing posts with label court cases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court cases. Show all posts

Thursday, September 30, 2010

File complaints against corrupt attorneys, magistrates & judges

Share|In our efforts to save our properties we have discovered not only fraud on the part of the banks but also in the judicial system. And it is rampant. We must continue to uncover the bank fraud, but I think there is another way to fight all of this corruption that may give quicker results. Everyone in every state needs to start filing complaints against the bank-aligned judges, magistrates, and attorneys/law firms.

In my case due process was completely violated by the magistrate who had only been on the bench for about two months. Sarah F. Law(LESS) in Archuleta County , Colorado is so eager to prove her stripes to the banksters that she violated four Rules of Civil Procedure and five United States Codes relating to Judicial Review. After being called on the carpet for her clear prejudice toward the bank she refused to dismiss the case, and when I refused to excuse her violations she had a police officer come into the court room and stand right next to me in an obvious attempt to intimidate me into cooperating. I did not relent, so ultimately Law(LESS) had the police officer physically remove me from the court room. After my removal, Law(LESS) and the banks attorney (Keith A. Gantenbein #39213 with Castle Meinhold & Stawiarski, LLC) commenced the Rule 120 hearing and proceeded in my absence. I was prevented from defending my property, and have witnesses that informed me the attorney gave unsworn testimony on behalf of the bank's alleged witness. They are so arrogant they did not even bother calling the absentee witness on the phone! The attorney stood in the court room and made unsworn statements as to what the witness would have said if they were on the phone.

Attorneys are not allowed to testify in court, and most certainly not for a witness who is not even in the room. The judge/magistrate should know this, but since Law(LESS) doesn't even know the Rules of Civil Procedure I guess I shouldn't be too surprised. However, the fact that Sarah F. Law(LESS) allowed this hearsay testimony from an attorney and then took it as fact is proof that this person is clearly prejudiced against justice and fairness and should be removed from the bench immediately.

The way to get these lying attorneys and corrupt judges/magistrates out of the systems is to file complaints against any offending parties with their regulatory agencies in your state. This will hit them where it hurts, in their wallets, because a few of the grievances will result in investigations, possible sanctions, and best of all it will increase the cost of their liability insurance to the point that it will be difficult for them to pay for it in order to stay in business. Now that's satisfaction!

So, I have put together a document based on what I have learned about filing complaints and am posting here with the hope that others will start doing this in states all around the country. The agencies listed in the document are for Colorado, but you can easily use the information to determine what agency to contact in your state. Click here to download the FileComplaints.pdf file.

Please take action! We need to stand together and bombard the regulatory agencies with complaints. That is the only way I see at this point to stop the judicial corruption that has permeated every court room in this country.


Wednesday, September 8, 2010

The Battle for Stuyvesant Town - NYTimes.com

The Battle for Stuyvesant Town - NYTimes.com: "LEGAL
The Battle for Stuyvesant Town
September 7, 2010, 5:00 PM

The fate of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village rests on the interpretation of one clause in a legal agreement.

Depending upon a judge’s reading of this agreement, control of the gargantuan housing complex in lower Manhattan will go either to the two investment funds Pershing Square Capital Management and Winthrop Realty Trust or to the senior lenders to the project, which include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

This battle between these two parties originates in the financing structure for the $5.4 billion October 2006 acquisition of Stuyvesant Town by the Tishman Speyer Development Corporation."

At the time of this financing, the senior and mezzanine lenders entered into an intercreditor agreement to govern their relationship. This is an arrangement typically entered into by creditors with differing security interests to ensure that their relationship terms are set forth at the beginning of the investment. The general purpose of the agreement is to make sure that the senior creditors subordinate the more junior lenders, meaning that the payment of the senior lender debt comes first.
In January, Tishman decided to cease paying all of the debt, both senior and mezzanine. This was the equivalent of deciding to hand over the keys to Stuy Town to these lenders.
Yet the battle only really began on Aug. 6, when Pershing and Winthrop bought the three most senior tranches of the mezzanine loans. Winthrop had actually held an interest in the loans since 2007.
The loans had a face value of $300 million but the two funds paid>>>>KEEP READING 


Friday, August 6, 2010

MEMOS AND MOTIONS FREE! | Matt Weidner Blog

MY GIFTS TO ALL OF YOU- MEMOS AND MOTIONS THAT WILL SHUT DOWN THE FORECLOSURE MILLS | Matt Weidner Blog

IF YOU NEVER CHECK OUT ANY OTHER BLOGPOST - you must check out the one above. Matt is giving out free documents that you can redact and use in your court cases to fight foreclosures. You will have to check out your own state or laws but this is wonderful information.

Other documents that help in foreclosure can be found at the yahoo group mentioned in the right hand column.

Please retweet this blogpost if you find it helpful in learning about government mortgage homeownership and bank loan modifications-

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Foreclosures: Fighting parents' eviction, Diamond Bar student wins rounds against Deutsche Bank - latimes.com

Foreclosures: Fighting parents' eviction, Diamond Bar student wins rounds against Deutsche Bank - latimes.com: "Fighting parents' foreclosure, Diamond Bar student wins rounds against Deutsche Bank
With no legal training, Zeenat Ali, 23, has been doing battle in court, winning judgments against the bank and two other companies mainly on procedural grounds.

1 2 next | � single page

Zeenat Ali at her Diamond Bar home, which is undergoing remodeling. She is suing Deutsche Bank, Downey Savings and Central Mortgage, alleging an illegal foreclosure. (Gary Friedman, Los Angeles Times / August 5, 2010)" >>>>>>>>>>>KEEP READING

Please retweet this blogpost if you find it helpful in learning about government mortgage homeownership and bank loan modifications

NEWS HEADLINES

Followers